LITTLE SLUT SENT BACK TO...

 

DHS said Afshar entered the U.S. on a tourist visa in June 2015, was granted asylum in 2019 and became a green card holder in 2021 under the Biden administration.

https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2026/04/secretary-rubio-revokes-green-cards-of-foreign-nationals-with-ties-to-iranian-terror-regime

My darling reader, whoever you may be, does this little slut look like she belongs to the family of the notorious Iranian military man, Soleimani? Of course not. For one thing, no hijab!, for another thing a dog! So may sins! This little bitch was hanging out in Los Angeles when many many young people like her were being beaten, tortured and executed for exactly the things she was free to do in the US. 

Much of the discontent by the people of Iran besides the crappy economy, is about this kind of hypocrisy from the Islamic regime. But I'm so not surprised. The revolution, any conflict really, in Iran and elsewhere all throughout history, isn't about color, religion, gender, etc. It has always been and always will be about socio-economic class. The poor ousted us, then became us. Now, the poor want these assholes out. Very funny too, when Reza Shah took over from the Qajar dynasty in Iran in the early 20th century, he promptly married Qajar women to elevate his social standing. This little slut's married name is Afshar. A famous aristocratic name. Social climb much. I wish in Iran, she will be treated like so many young woman have been, but she won't because of privilege. 

The world is all about the rich fighting the poor. And always has been. Disgusting is the US government who allowed her in! Really? But the rich play with the rich across the world, they don't play with the rest of us. 

I HOPE ICE WILL DO TO HER WHAT THE IRANIAN REGIME DID TO SO MANY YOUNG WOMEN. OR BETTER YET DEPORT HER ASS TO AN AFRICAN COUNTRY WITH FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION. BON VOYAGE BITCH. BETTER YET DO TO HER WHAT THE IRANIAN REGIME DID TO THE FAMILIES OF THE SOCCER PLAYERS WHO WANTED TO STAY IN AUSTRALIA.  

BIG CHIP

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/04/nyregion/ulta-harlem-nyc-civil-rights-black-hair.html 

Please take that chip off your shoulder. No one should feel the humiliation of being turned away and rudely but really?! Black hair is dry and brittle, if a hair dresser doesn't know how to deal with it, it can get damaged. Did this woman think for a minute that maybe the stylist had had a bad experience? Had done black hair before and got it wrong and suffered the consequences? That maybe she or he wasn't confident about their skill level? 

In high school, I had a black roommate who corn-braided her hair with beads. I wanted her to do the same to my hair, she said, your hair is too straight. Was I supposed to be offended? She was telling the truth. Oh sorry, I should have also been lanced for cultural appropriation! There aren't a lot of black people on the UES of Manhattan, so you want a black hair expert, go to Harlem!  I am middle eastern with long thick wavy hair that can be frizzy if brushed out, when I choose a hair dresser I never choose a blonde. What would she know about lightening my dark brown hair? Common sense is a good thing! Too bad it has gone out of style. 

PPPPLEEEASE

 

    

My comment to this article:

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/03/opinion/epstein-files-emails-metoo.html#commentsContainer

I want to know whether Lavinia was paid or came back for more money? I know this will never be published but I'm sick of this puritanical culture that equates these coercions with rape. Teenage girls have had sex at 14 and so on forever, in the west and elsewhere. Rape is when a woman is physically constrained; sex slaves are those are thrown into a locked room and forced into having sex with a number of men a day; raped and abused are African girls who go through sexual "lessons" then are "tested" by men with HIV. Give me a break. These little bitches were impressed by the glitz. Do they look constrained, do they look sad and horrified? They look like they are having a paaartaaay! They are just upset they weren't the ones who ended up the First Lady. 

 

LET'S STOP THIS SHIT WITH CHAVEZ

 

                                                     https://www.nytimes.com/video/watch

So tired of this woke/me-too-movement shit with Chavez. All his "victims" say what a great and bigger than life man he was and that is why they and their parents had trusted him. Yes, he was, yes he changed a lot for the latino farmer population, etc. But he was also a man! Nubile Lolitas aren't victims, they are participants. People in Europe, not "barbarian" cultures married during teenage years, married cousins, etc. not in the middle ages but the 19th century. This puritanism is disgusting. 

Victims are people whose agency was taken away, who were physically restrained from leaving, who ran and never went back, or had fought their assailants and lost. This nonsense just takes away from real victims' legitimate pain. 

Yes, Chavez like Epstein was pig, when have the majority of men not been pigs?!

TONE DEAF PIECE IN THE TIMES

 https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/03/23/nyregion/nyc-budgeting-affordability-gossai.html

So much about this article offends me. First of all, 500K is a ton of money so to say how do they do it? is obscene. I know families of 4 who live on less than 100K. Then the article says their biggest expense is childcare. They put their 1 year old in daycare. Future psychos are born that way. That child needs to be at home with one of this parents, or a close relative. Stop spending money on daycare and care for your own child!!

NO CHEF NEEDED

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/21/nyregion/hamptons-private-chef-summer.html 

Did a NYT editor choose this picture on purpose?! Or was it simple stupidity? Judging by this photo, these women should hire a wellness guru, a diet expert rather than a chef. Do these rich pigs really need to stuff their fat faces with more fancy fair?

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/11/briefing/what-you-need-to-know-about-charlie-kirks-assassination.html

THE LIBERAL: "FINALLY, A GOOD SHOT."

THE CHRISTIAN CONSERVATIVE: "CHARLIE KIRKS IS A HERO, A MARTYR REALLY. HE GAVE HIS LIFE FOR HIS BELIEFS, HE DIES DEFENDING HIS BELIEFS. NO AMERICAN PATRIOT WILL NOT SACRIFICE HIS LIFE TO PRESERVE OUR SACRED GOD GIVEN RIGHT TI BEAR ARMS. LONG LIVE THE 2ND AMENDMENT AND WE SHOULD ALL PRAY FOR OUR CHARLIE'S BELOVED SOULD. AMEN."

THE CONSPIRACY THEORIST: "NOTHING BUT HIS COULD HAVE TAKEN ATTENTION OFF THE EPSTEIN FILES. POOR CHARLIE, SACRIFICED TO TRUMPS SINS."